What Are Regulations on Debt Trading Contracts in Vietnam? | ANT Lawyers

Along with the development of socio-economic activities, right to collect debt has become an asset right, hence its transferability is also recognized. Vietnam law recognizes debt as a commodity that can be traded through a debt trading contract. However, in order for the debt trading contract to be legally valid and ensure the rights and obligations are enforced, the parties need to pay attention to the provisions on the debt trading contract.

Firstly, in terms of the right to enter into a debt trading contract, according to the provisions of the Civil Code on the sale and purchase of property rights, the property right is the right to claim debt in Vietnam. Accordingly, the right to recover debt becomes the subject of a contract that the parties can transfer as if it were a special type of property. In addition, the debt trading contract aims to transfer ownership of the right of debt recovery and at the same time transfer the debt seller’s obligations to the debt purchaser. This is a transaction that does not affect the interests of the debtor totally. Therefore, the transfer of the right to demand does not require the consent of the obligor, whereby the parties can enter into a debt trading contract without the consent of the debtor.

Secondly, in terms of the form of the debt trading contract, based on the provisions of law prescribing debt trading contract by credit institutions and foreign bank branches, debt trading contract is a written agreement on the transfer of the right to collect debt for a debt arising from a lending operation, payment on behalf of the guarantee, whereby the debt seller transfers ownership of the debt to the debt purchaser and receives payment from the debt purchaser. Therefore, the debt trading contract must be made as a written document.

Furthermore, the debt trading contract must be signed by the legal representative or the authorized representative of the debt purchase and sale parties. Therefore, according to this provision, the debt trading contract does not require the parties to be notarized or authenticated. If necessary, the parties can agree on the notarization or authentication of the debt trading contract. In addition, the parties can make an agreement that the contract can be made in a foreign language and the parties need to consent on which language of the contract will be used in case of a dispute arisen. In addition, in case the debt purchaser and debt seller are organizations with legal status, in addition to the legal representative to sign, the contract needs to be stamped. These are strict regulations on the established form to ensure the legality of the contract’s form.

Thirdly, when drafting a debt trading contract, it must contains the following principal contents: (i) Time for signing the debt trading contract; (ii) Names and addresses of the parties to the debt trading contract; (iii) Name and title of the representative of the parties to the debt trading contract; (iv) Name and address of the debtor and related parties (if any) to the purchased or sold debt; (v) Details of debt purchased and sold: Loan amount, loan period, purpose, book value of the debt up to the time of debt purchase and sale; (vi) Security measures for the debtor’s payment obligation for the purchased or sold debt (if any); (vii) Debt selling price, payment method, payment term; (viii) Time, method and procedures for transferring debt documents and records, including dossiers and documents on debt security (if any); The time the debt purchaser becomes the subrogator, the debt seller has obligations; (ix) Rights and obligations of debt sellers and debt buyers; (x) Liability of the parties for breach of contract; (xi) Settlement of arising disputes. These are the basic and mandatory contents of a debt trading contract. In addition, the parties can make agree on other contents in the debt trading contract that are not contrary to the provisions of the laws.

In addition, during the implementation of the debt trading contract, the law allows the parties to agree to amend, supplement or cancel the content of the debt trading contract. However, the decision to amend, supplement or cancel must be based on ensuring compliance with the provisions of law.

Therefore, the establishment of a debt trading contract in Vietnam is basically the same as other property rights transfer transactions. However, debt is a special object of property rights, therefore the parties need to strictly comply with the provisions of law on the content and form of the contract to ensure the legality of the contract as well as the rights and obligations of the parties. It is suggested to engage lawyers with specialization in debt recovery and dispute resolution to assist drafting or reviewing debt trading contract for its effective usage.

What Are Challenges in Debt Recovery Litigation Procedures for Enterprise? | ANT Lawyers

In the operation of the enterprises, the arising of bad debts could be unavoidable. However, in order to be able to file lawsuit and collect debts and minimize bad debts in practice, there are still many difficulties. Currently, the process of debt recovery according to the provisions of the law still encounter many problems and shortcomings, while enterprises need more effective solutions to recover debts fully and quickly in order to ensure revenue and financial balance for enterprise.

In order to be able to recover debts according to the provisions of the law, enterprises could hire dispute lawyers or by themselves must go through two stages with relatively complicated procedures. Accordingly, the lawsuit need to be filed and after the court’s judgment, the enterprise needs to file a petition for civil judgment enforcement. Because, the trial stage and the judgment execution phase are two independent stages, each with a different process.

First, the stage of lawsuits in court. When the enterprise’s interests are infringed, the enterprise will need to file a lawsuit at a competent court. This is a traditional method of lawsuits that forces enterprise to comply with the court’s strict processes and procedures and relevant legal regulations.

Specifically, in order to initiate a lawsuit at the court, an enterprise must meet the following conditions to initiate a lawsuit: (i) there is a debt incurred and the debtor fails to pay the debt as committed, leading to a dispute and the enterprise believes that rights and interests are infringed; (ii) the dispute between the enterprise and the debtor in this case must fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the court, not under the jurisdiction of any other agency or organization (arbitration); (iii) in some cases, if there is an agreement or is required by law to carry out pre-litigation procedures such as conciliation, negotiation, notification, etc., the enterprise must complete such procedures before requesting a competent court to settle disputes between the enterprise and the debtor. In addition, in the petition, the enterprise needs to enclose invoices, vouchers and loan documents to prove that the debt collection is grounded. These are the basic conditions that enterprise need to keep in mind when filing a lawsuit to ensure that the petition is valid and not returned.

After the petition is accepted and the enterprise completes the payment of the court fee advance, the court will conduct verification and collect evidences; conducting meetings, checking the handover, accessing and disclosing evidences and conciliation. In case the involved parties cannot reconcile with each other on the payment plan or agree on interest and debt, the court will bring the case to trial. During this period, enterprises need to consider late payment interest, principal and debtor’s financial situation in order for request to be accepted by the court and serve as a basis for possible judgment enforcement.

Second, the procedure for requesting judgment enforcement. After the judgment or decision of the court takes legal effect, it must be respected by organizations and all citizens. Accordingly, enterprises, especially debtors, within the scope of their responsibilities, should strictly abide by judgments and decisions and must take responsibility before law for judgment enforcement. Within 5 years from the date the judgment or decision takes legal effect, the creditor can by himself or authorize another person or dispute law law firm to make a written request for judgment enforcement and send it to the district-level judgment enforcement agency where the court is located for first-instance trial court to request judgment enforcement. Accordingly, enterprises need to prepare a written request for judgment enforcement together with the judgment or decision requested for enforcement and other relevant documents. For the extent of the petition for judgment enforcement, the enterprise needs to show information about the debtor’s assets or judgment enforcement conditions.

In addition, enterprises have the right to request civil judgment enforcement agencies to apply measures to secure judgment enforcement, including: freezing of accounts, temporary seizure of assets and papers, temporary suspension of registration, transfer, etc. change the current state of assets to avoid the debtor’s dispersal of assets and inability to repay the debt according to the judgment. At the same time, the judgment enforcement agency will issue a notice of judgment enforcement, setting a time limit for the debtor to voluntarily execute the judgment of 15 days from the date the debtor receives or is duly notified execution decision. At the end of the above-mentioned voluntary time limit, the debtor who has conditions for judgment enforcement but does not voluntarily execute the judgment will be subject to coercion.

The enforcement of money assets will be applied by the judgment enforcement agency one of the measures such as deducting money from the account; subtract from the judgment debtor’s income, collect money from the judgment debtor’s enterprise activities; collect money from judgment debtors who are holding or collect money from judgment debtors who are kept by third parties or sell assets of judgment debtors to collect debts.

Although the judgments and decisions have taken effect, the initiation of lawsuits and judgment enforcement in many cases still cannot be enforced and the enterprise can debt recovery is challenging.

One is the determination of the debtor’s address for the court to serve the documents. The debtor always tends to evade and not cooperate, i.e. constantly changing addresses and causing difficulties for the court in the process of settling the case. Accordingly, the court could not proceed to serve the debtor, then some courts have decided to return the petition to the claimant, or suspend the case because it considers that there are not enough conditions to initiate a lawsuit or not summon the defendant. This is one of the main factors causing delays in the legal process when enterprises initiate lawsuits.

The second is the application of trial procedure in absentia. In order to fully meet the conditions for trial in absentia, the court will take time and many measures to verify and post procedural documents according to regulations. Besides, for debt disputes with complicated elements, it takes more time to collect more documents and evidences, conduct solicitation of document expertise, etc. or the case has many people with interests and obligations related, the trial was adjourned several times. Therefore, the intangible interests of enterprises have been seriously affected.

Third is the execution process. In fact, many enterprises have had court judgments, but the judgment enforcement process has lasted for many years, and enterprise have not been able to recover their debts. This problem may arise from the lack of flexibility in the coordination between banks, other agencies and organizations and the judgment enforcement agency, which is detrimental to the verification and distraint of assets of the agency, directly affecting the time of judgment enforcement.

Fourth is for the distraint, auction of assets that are assets that are difficult to determine the value of, or properties that are in dispute or there are no auction participants are also reasons for the delay in debt recovery.

Fifth is due to human subjective factors. Specifically, due to opposing and uncooperative acts of changing the current status of mortgaged assets, obstructing the verification of judgment enforcement conditions, asset valuation, and asset auction. For movable property, the debtor could actively move or disperse in order to cause difficulties in the handling process. In addition, there are cases where enforcers violate the time limit for notifying or serving judgment enforcement decisions/notices, failing to conduct verification…

Hence, enterprises that wish to proceed debt recovery effectively need to proactively collect information, judgment execution conditions of the debtor and provide it to the judgment enforcement agency. Besides, it is necessary to seek the legal advice of law firm with experience in litigation and enforcement for debt recovery process in Vietnam.

Debt Recovery | ANT Lawyers

We understand chasing late payment is costly and time consuming. At ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam with offices in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi, we could act on client’s behalf in dealing with the debtor, and in the meantime do a thorough research on debtors’ assets for payment obligations for evaluation of options to reclaim the debts. Debt recovery lawyers at ANT Lawyers Vietnam beside other legal profession skills are equipped with mediation, an alternative dispute resolution skill that helps handling disputes effectively and professionally. If pre-litigation efforts fail, we will look at an alternative strategy and taking legal actions will be the last resort.

We have experience in dealing with debt recovery cases for clients being exporters, insurance companies from EU, US, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong. ANT Lawyers is an exclusive Vietnam law firm member of Prae Legal, an international law firm network. We do act as Vietnam agent for one of the largest debt recovery specialist firms of its kind from the UK. ANT Lawyers is also an official member of World Mediation Organization, a global mediation organization in Berlin, Germany which foster and promote mediation practice throughout the world. Lawyers at ANT Lawyers regularly undertake training and seminar in mediation to public free of charge to promote the mediation practice in Vietnam.

If you need help in addressing debt recovery and litigation issues, please either email us at ant@antlawyers.vn or call to our office at: +84 28 730 86 529.

Let ANT Lawyers help your business in Vietnam.